![black downlow gay men making love sex tube black downlow gay men making love sex tube](https://img.memecdn.com/gay-black-jewish-kkk-wtf_o_169530.jpg)
If you’ve been enjoying casual conversation for a few minutes, ask him for his number. The first time you meet may not be the time to ask him out for coffee. If your crush is 0.5 miles away, why not? Who can blame us in a culture where we are so commonly reduced to our basic anatomy? You assume the risk of seeing one (or ten) every time you log onto the app. However, if you’re on Grindr or Scruff (or any gay sex site, really), seeing unrequested cocks, holes, and sex shots is unavoidable. If they end up on a child’s phone, things get very messy, and you may need to call a lawyer. The trouble with sending nudes is that it’s difficult to control their dissemination once you send them. Sending nudes between two consenting adults is generally fine, although if distributed vengefully, as sometimes happens between exes, you can sue for harassment. Sending XXX pics, solicited or otherwise, is a severe offense in all 50 states if the sender or receiver is underage - even if the person in the images is an adult. Whipping out your junk in public to someone nonconsenting is a crime. The line between what is allowed and disallowed in sex is drawn at consent. Some guys like anonymous sex and will meet up from a dick pic - no face needed. Send one via Grindr and you may get blocked. The Commission on Sex in Prison’s final report, published today (Tuesday 17 March), features accounts from former prisoners speaking for the first time about their experiences of sex behind bars.Unsolicited XXX pics are the subject of endless debate. Sex in prison: Experiences of former prisoners is the fifth and final briefing paper published by the Commission, which was established by the Howard League for Penal Reform and includes eminent academics, former prison governors and health experts. Recommendations from the Commission’s two-year inquiry will be presented today (Tuesday 17 March) at a conference in London. The Commission sought permission to interview current prisoners about their experiences of sex in prison, but this approach was blocked by the Ministry of Justice. However, Dr Alisa Stevens, Lecturer in Criminology at the University of Southampton, was able to interview 26 former prisoners during the summer of 2014 – 24 men and two women. Her report concludes that a national survey of both the serving prison population and former prisoners, fully supported by but independent of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), is “urgently required” to understand better the scale of consensual and coercive sex in prison. The former prisoners interviewed by Dr Stevens had been jailed for a wide range of offences. Eighteen interviewees self-identified as heterosexual, four as gay, and four as bisexual. Gay and bisexual men reported that while they were “fairly” or “totally” open about their sexuality on the wing, they were discreet about their sexual activities and relationships. They usually had sex in the cell of one of the participants or in the showers, during periods of association. Some men who shared cells had sex at night. When asked how many sexual partners interviewees had had in prison, numbers ranged from one to “about 30, 35”. He said he had resumed exclusively heterosexual relationships since leaving prison, and he added: “I’m completely straight what happened then was just about having my sexual needs met, in a particular time and place, where I couldn’t get sex.” One heterosexual man said that he had had consensual sex with gay or bisexual prisoners “out of necessity”. The research project found that the availability of condoms and dental dams – to minimise prisoners’ risk of exposure to sexually transmitted infections – varied from prison to prison.